Archive for October, 2009

My Spouse Won’t Give My Stuff Back! What Do I do?

Monday, October 19th, 2009

Dividing relatively small value items of personal property (that junk in the house) is an area where the legal system often performs poorly. Oftentimes, the monetary value of these items doesn’t justify the legal costs incurred in their retrieval. In Court, the division of these types of items is usually the last thing to be addressed. Every attorney has a horror story to tell about the case where many torturous hours were spent between two litigants arguing over every small piece of furniture, silverware and tools.

A spouse who is no longer residing in the marital home (either because they voluntarily left or they were put out by the Court) is at a distinct disadvantage in identifying, dividing and retrieving these types of items. If you can divide these small items between yourself and your spouse without the involvement of the Courts you will save a great deal of expense and hassle. If you cannot do this on your own, start by preparing a complete and comprehensive list of everything that you want to get back. Don’t wait to go to Court. Show that you are serious about retrieving these items and that this is important to you by having your attorney forward the list to your spouse’s attorney before you go to Court. Don’t wait for the last minute and be faced with a decision as to whether to settle the case or fight for the bed! Also, don’t tie up valuable attorney time by wasting time on small value items.

Be flexible and be willing to trade-off different items. Don’t ask for all the televisions in the house - but try to get at least one. Try to get something in each class of item - a vcr, a stereo, a dvd player, some silverware, plates etc.. . This way you won’t have to start from scratch. The same with furniture - divide it room by room. If you don’t have space for an item or it will be difficult to move, seriously consider whether you really want it back. Do you really need a lawnmower and garden tools when you’re moving into an apartment? If you are not allowed back in the house because of a restraining order - ask to inventory the items in advance in the company of a police officer (called a detail - and be prepared for a cost - usually a minimum of 3-4 hours). If you have pictures with sentimental value to divide and cannot agree - offer to split the costs of making a second set (this is usually what judges will do anyway). Decide what you really need and what you can live without. Lastly, seize the opportunity to reduce the clutter in your life and get a fresh start!

Barry Lewis, Attorney at Law - Divorce Lawyer Massachusetts - http://www.DivorceLawyerMa.com

Annulment or Divorce ?

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

Generally, it is wiser to file for a divorce than an annulment. The requirements to obtain an annulment vary by jurisdiction and can often make the prospect of obtaining an annulment “iffy” at best. On the other hand, almost anybody that desires to get divorced will be able to obtain one - although not necessarily on the terms that they want.

For instance, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts requires one of two grounds to grant an annulment - either incest or fraud. I won’t go into the incest grounds in detail here. But, it should be sufficient to say that incest isn’t an option for most parties. That leaves parties with the fraud option. However, it is a very specific type of fraud - “Fraud in the inducement”. This means that but for the fraud the marriage would not have taken place. Most judges aren’t going to grant an annulment for minor fraud - despite the fact that a party might testify that they would not have married the other spouse if they had known about the “fraud”. On the other hand, Judges usually have far less difficulty in determining that a marriage has ended and granting a divorce.

The other difficulty is that the party whom is alleged to have committed the fraud may not take the allegations sitting down and protracted and expensive litigation may result from a relatively simple situation.

The bottom line is to not assume that just because the marriage is short and there are no children that an annulment will be granted - It may be far easier and simpler to obtain a divorce.

Barry Lewis, Attorney at Law - Divorce Lawyer Massachusetts - http://www.DivorceLawyerMa.com

Reasons for a Legal Separation Instead of a Divorce

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

Many people are under the misconception that they are required to “legally separate” before they can get divorced. In most jurisdictions, this is no longer required. If you want to get divorced, you should file for a divorce and not a legal separation. Filing for a legal separation first will only increase the time and expense before the divorce is final.

However, we do run into several recurring situations that lend themselves to a filing of a separate support action (legal separation).

The first and most common situation is when the spouses have separated and one party needs to get support (child support and/or spousal support) from the other - but doesn’t want to file for divorce.

The second common reason is when a spouse has a drug and/or alcohol problem and the spouse filing for legal separation wants to send them a strong message “clean up your act or else”.

Although less common these days, devout Catholics will file for a legal separation because they don’t believe in divorce.

A legal separation should also be considered when the marriage is a little short of ten years. At the ten year mark, a spouse is entitled to one-half of the other spouse’s social security upon retirement (if they haven’t remarried and it’s more than they would be entitled to on their own social security claim).

There can also often be various strategic reasons to file for a legal separation instead of a divorce (such as if the other spouse has a new partner and will probably want to accelerate the divorce process).

Lastly, you should be aware that Courts will usually not divide property as part of a legal separation (although this doesn’t prevent the parties from agreeing to divide property between themselves) and that in most jurisdictions it is possible to counterclaim for divorce when one party files for separate support. Therefore, you might have effectively filed for divorce anyway!

Barry Lewis, Attorney at Law - Divorce Lawyer Massachusetts - http://www.DivorceLawyerMa.com